China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Court Rules on Unfair Competition Case Involving Live Streaming Data

Fri, 04 Mar 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

In January 2022, the Yuhang Primary People’s Court, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, pronounced a case of unfair competition involving the rights and interests of the live streaming data of Douyin.

In this case, a company was ruled to pay CNY 1 million in damages for obtaining and using data from Douyin without permission.

It’s the first unfair competition case involving the rights and interests of live streaming data in China.

Douyin, the Chinese version of Tik Tok, is operated by the plaintiff, Microseeding Horizon Technology Co., Ltd.

Douyin launched the live streaming function in 2017.

The website developed and operated by the defendant Liujie is able to display detailed data of major online live streaming platforms like Douyin, including the earnings of live streamers.

The court found that as the operator of Douyin, Microseeding Horizon can realize its business strategies by using the data involved in the cases, which therefore gives it the right to enjoy the overall live streaming data as a competitive interest.

By displaying the data, Liujie has broken Microseeding Horizon’s data display rules, which were set to maintain its user stickiness.

Thus. Liujie had jeopardized its competitive advantage.

The court held that Liujie’s acquisition and use of the data involved in this case were improper and constituted unfair competition.

 

 

Cover Photo by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.