China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese EV Maker Fined for Illegal Collection of 430,000 Facial Images

Wed, 19 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

Recently, XPeng Motors’s sale unit in Shanghai was fined CNY 100,000 by the market regulator in Xuhui District, Shanghai, for illegally collecting customers’ facial information.

XPeng is one of China’s mainstream local electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers, known for its self-driving technology which is neck and neck with Tesla.

According to the administrate sanction document by the market regulator in Xuhui District, Shanghai, XPeng purchased 22 sets of cameras equipped with facial recognition and installed them in its stores as a way to record the number of people entering the stores and analyze the ratio of men to women, age, etc. From January to June this year, a total of 431,623 facial photos had been collected and uploaded.

XPeng did not inform consumers of the data collection and usage, nor did it ask for their permission, which had violated the law on the protection of the rights and interests of consumers.

 

 

Cover Photo by YoHa Lee on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)