China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Local Court to Standardize Ascertainment of Foreign Law

Tue, 18 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

In Dec. 2021, the Nanjing Maritime Court issued the “Operating Procedures on the Ascertainment of Foreign Law (For Trial Implementation)” (hereinafter “the Procedures”, 关于外国法查明工作操作规程(试行)) to standardize the ascertainment of foreign law.

The Procedures mainly refines the requirements for ascertaining foreign law.

According to the Procedures, when Chinese and foreign legal experts or legal professional organizations provide opinions on foreign law, if the foreign law is statutory law, it is required to provide the full text or excerpts of the statutory law and the necessary explanation of the relevant legal provisions; otherwise, the latest cases and analysis of the facts and rules of adjudication of the case are required.

The Nanjing Maritime Court also compiled the “Case Compilation about Foreign Law Ascertainment of Nanjing Maritime Court China” and “The Case Compilation of Chinese Maritime Courts on the Application of International Maritime Conventions and Customs”, which has laid out the foundation for the ascertainment and application of foreign law.

According to our observation, China has witnessed a surge in demand for ascertaining foreign law since 2019. The Supreme People’s Court of China is also seeking solutions to meet that demand.

 

 

Cover Photo by 戸山 神奈 on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.