China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chongqing Court Issues Sentencing Guidelines for Illegal Fishing

Sat, 18 Sep 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 12 Aug. 2021, Chongqing High People's Court held a press conference to release the Sentencing Guidelines for Illegal Fishing (hereinafter “the Guidelines”, 关于非法捕捞犯罪的量刑指引). The Guidelines aims to unify the trial standards for criminal cases on illegal fishing in Chongqing, and to crack down on illegal fishing, in line with the "ten-year fishing ban" in key waters of the Yangtze River Basin implemented since 1 Jan. 2021.

The Guidelines includes the extent of damage to the water ecological environment caused by a criminal act into the circumstances for sentencing. For instance, pursuant to the Guidelines, where an offender fishes through "electricity, poison or explosion" or by using a prohibited tool or method which seriously damages the water ecological environment such as single trawling or pair trawling, the sentencing shall be fixed-term imprisonment of at least six months.

Besides, the Guidelines divides the key water areas of the Yangtze River Basin into five types according to the nature of water areas, and takes the main breeding period (from 1 Mar. to 30 June of each year) and the important breeding time (from 10: 00 PM to 6: 00 AM) of aquatic organisms as the important factors for adjusting the criminal punishment. For illegal fishing in waters with high protection value, and in spring and at night, higher penalties will be adopted in sentencing.

 

 

Cover Photo by Alan Cutter (https://unsplash.com/@flashearth) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.