China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

CIETAC Reduces Arbitration Fees in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic

Mon, 11 Jul 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 30 May 2022, China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) issued the “Special Relief Arrangements on Arbitration Fees Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic” (关于应对新冠肺炎疫情纾困当事人减退仲裁费的特别安排, hereinafter referred to as the “Arrangements”).

CIETAC is the most prominent international arbitration institution in China.

The Arrangements conveys two key messages.

1. Arbitration fees can be reduced under certain conditions.

For cases where the claimant has submitted the Request for Arbitration, CIETAC shall deduct 12% of the arbitration fees calculated under the Arbitration Fees Schedule; such discount shall also apply to the counterclaims and the amendments to the claims/counterclaims of the cases described above filed during the implementation period of the Arrangements.

2. Parties are encouraged to resolve disputes online.

If, before the first hearing, both parties agree to conduct arbitral proceedings online (including procedures of document exchange, oral hearing, etc.), CIETAC may reduce the arbitration fees by 15%.

The Arrangements came into effect on 1 Jun. 2022 and will expire on 31 Oct. 2022.

 

 

Cover Photo by Zhipeng Ya on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.