China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

CNIPA to Further Regulate Patent Application

Tue, 01 Jun 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 6 May 2021, China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) published the “Draft Amendments to Several Provisions on Regulating Patent Application Activities (Draft for Public Comment)” (关于规范申请专利行为的若干规定修改草案(征求意见稿)) (hereinafter referred to as the "Draft") to gather public opinions as of 6 June 2021.

For the purpose of the Draft, abnormal patent application activities refer to activities where any unit or individual, without the purpose of protecting innovation, independently or jointly submits various types of patent applications, acts as a patent application agent, or transfers the right to apply for a patent or a patent right so as to seek illegitimate benefits or fabricate innovation achievements and service performance.

The Draft clarifies the special procedures adopted by CNIPA for the handling of abnormal patent applications in the phases of patent application acceptance, preliminary examination, actual examination, re-examination, or the international phase of international applications. The Draft also provides a remedy for applicants who refuse to accept the determination of abnormal patent applications.

 

 

Cover Photo by Road Trip with Raj (https://unsplash.com/@roadtripwithraj) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)