China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

CSRC Improves Regulatory Requirements for Managers of Publicly Offered Funds

Mon, 04 Jul 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

Recently, China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) revised the “Administrative Measures for Securities Investment Fund Management Companies” (证券投资基金管理公司管理办法) and renamed it as the “Administrative Measures for Supervising Managers of Publicly Offered Securities Investment Funds” (公开募集证券投资基金管理人监督管理办法, hereinafter referred to as the “Measures”).

The Measures aims to strengthen the supervision over managers of publicly-offered securities investment funds. As China’s publicly-offered securities investment funds have developed rapidly over the years, the number of their managers has also increased. That’s why the CSRC hopes to strengthen its supervision over these fund managers.

On 20 May 2022, the CSRC officially issued the Measures and complementary rules.

According to the Measures and complementary rules, the supervision over fund managers will cover the whole chain of “access - internal control - operation - governance - exit - supervision.”

In terms of access, the Measures improves the establishment conditions for fund management companies and their shareholders, completes the negative list for shareholders with less than 5% ownership, and strengthens the financial soundness requirements for non-major shareholders with more than 5% ownership.

The Measures also allows professional asset management institutions such as securities management subsidiaries, insurance management companies and wealth management subsidiaries of banks within the same group to apply for public offering licenses.

In terms of exit, the Measures establishes an exit mechanism for managers of publicly offered funds. Through the mechanism, the fund management companies that fail in business operations can proactively apply for deregistration of the qualifications for management of publicly offered funds or achieve market-oriented exit through mergers and acquisitions.

 

 

Cover Photo by JuniperPhoton on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.