China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

CSRC to Give Priority to Civil Compensation Regarding Offenders’ Properties

Mon, 18 Apr 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 11 March 2022, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and Ministry of Finance jointly published the “Regulation on Matters Regarding the Priority Use of Property of Violators of Securities Law for Civil Compensation (Draft)” (hereinafter “the Regulation”, 关于证券违法行为人财产优先用于承担民事赔偿责任有关事项的规定) for public comments.

Article 220 of China’s Securities Law stipulates that, in violations of the Law, the defendant shall be subject to civil liability and administrative fines, penalties, and confiscation of illegal proceeds; priority shall be given to civil compensation if the defendant’s assets are insufficient to satisfy both.

However, in judicial practice, the decision of administrative penalty of a case is often reached prior to the civil rulings. In some cases involving administrative penalties, especially with a large number of fines, the defendant is usually left with insufficient money to pay the civil compensation after paying the requested fines.

The Regulation aims to ensure that aggrieved investors can have compensation in preference to administrative penalties.

 

 

Cover Photo by David Veksler on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.