China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Hainan to Implement Negative List for Cross-border Services

Tue, 21 Sep 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 26 July 2021, the Ministry of Commerce issued the “Special Administrative Measures for Cross-border Trade in Services in Hainan Free Trade Port (Negative List) (2021 Edition)” (海南自由贸易港跨境服务贸易特别管理措施(负面清单)(2021年版)), specifying 70 special administrative measures in 11 categories. To ensure the implementation of the Negative List, the  Department of Commerce of Hainan Province released the “Administrative Measures for the Negative List for Cross-border Trade in Services in Hainan Free Trade Port (for Trial Implementation) (hereinafter the "Measures", 海南自由贸易港跨境服务贸易负面清单管理办法(试行)) on 17 Aug. 2021, to gather public opinions until 24 Aug. 2021.

The Measures applies to the administration and opening-up of cross-border trade in services within the Hainan Free Trade Port, with the geographical scope covering the Hainan Island. “Cross-border trade in services” in the Measures refers to the commercial activities of overseas service providers providing services to market players and individuals within Hainan Free Trade Port in a cross-border manner. According to the Measures, overseas service providers shall not provide any of the services on the Negative List in a cross-border manner, and all relevant authorities shall strictly prohibit access to such services. For fields outside the Negative List, Hainan Free Trade Port shall implement administration pursuant to the principle of equal treatment for domestic and foreign services and service providers.

 

 

Cover Photo by Eriksson Luo (https://unsplash.com/@newdawn) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)