China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Hangzhou Int’l Commercial Court Hears Its First Case, Involving Procurement of Test Kits

Mon, 15 May 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 16 Mar. 2023, the Hangzhou International Commercial Court heard its first case and made a judgment in court.

On the morning of 15 Mar. 2023, the Hangzhou International Commercial Court was officially established. This is the ninth international commercial court in China and the first one in Zhejiang Province.

In addition to the China International Commercial Court (CICC) under China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC), other local courts in China are also keen to establish international commercial courts, so as to gather the most experienced local judges engaged in international commercial disputes and hear international commercial cases in specific regions in such courts.

The first case before the Hangzhou International Commercial Court, described earlier, involved the procurement of test kits by a German company from a Chinese company during the COVID-19 epidemic. The Court rendered a judgment based on the “United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods”, requiring the Chinese company to refund the German company the purchase price of EUR 1,203,400 with corresponding interest.

 

 

Cover Photo by Jerry Zhang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)