China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Hong Kong and Mainland China: New Chapter for Mutual Civil Judgment Recognition and Enforcement

Wed, 31 Jan 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

Judgments made by courts in China’s Mainland can be enforced in Hong Kong after being registered by Hong Kong courts.

On 10 Nov. 2023, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region announced that the “Mainland Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance” (hereinafter the “Enforcement Ordinance”) would officially come into effect on 29 Jan. 2024. The “Mainland Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Reciprocal Enforcement) Rules” (hereinafter the “Enforcement Rules”), established under Article 35 of the Enforcement Ordinance by the Chief Judge of the High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, will also come into effect on the same day.

This marks the official implementation of the “Arrangement on Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters by the Courts of the Mainland and of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region” (hereinafter the “Arrangement”) in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

On 18 Jan. 2019, China’s Supreme People’s Court and the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region signed the Arrangement.

This Arrangement consolidates into a unified and comprehensive mechanism various rules about recognizing and enforcing civil and commercial judgments between the two regions, which were previously scattered among specific arrangements and Hong Kong common law. This includes various types of judgments relating to contracts, torts, and certain intellectual property disputes.

This Arrangement makes Hong Kong the first jurisdiction to have such a comprehensive arrangement for reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments with China’s Mainland.

The Enforcement Ordinance and Enforcement Rules make the Arrangement more practical.

In terms of enforcing Mainland civil and commercial judgments in Hong Kong, the Enforcement Ordinance adopts a “registration mechanism”. In particular, creditors under Mainland’s civil and commercial judgments may unilaterally apply to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region’s Court of First Instance (hereinafter the “Court of First Instance”) to register the judgment or any part of it. Once registered, Mainland’s civil and commercial judgments can be enforced as if they were originally made by the Court of First Instance.

 

 

Photo by Jerry Wang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Releases IP Guiding Cases

In December 2023, China’s Supreme People's Court issued its 39th batch of guiding cases focused on intellectual property rights, covering various aspects such as IPR infringement disputes, patent ownership, and copyright ownership.

SPC Releases Judicial Interpretation on Contract Law

In December 2023, China's Supreme People's Court issued a judicial interpretation on the Contract section of the Civil Code, aimed at guiding courts in adjudicating disputes and ensuring nationwide consistency in application.

China Introduces New Drunk Driving Convictions Standards Effective 2023

In December 2023, China announced updated standards for drunk driving convictions, stating that individuals who drive with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 80mg/100ml or higher on a breath test may be held criminally liable, according to the recent joint announcement by the Supreme People's Court, Supreme People's Procuratorate, Ministry of Public Security, and Ministry of Justice.

SPC's Revised Rules Extend Reach of International Commercial Courts

In December 2023, China's Supreme People’s Court's newly amended provisions extended the reach of its International Commercial Courts (CICC). To establish a valid choice of court agreement, three requirements must be met - the international nature, the agreement in writing, and the amount in controversy - while the 'actual connection' is no longer required.