China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

MOFCOM Issues Opinions on Internal Compliance Mechanism for Export Control of Dual-Use Items

Thu, 27 May 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 28 Apr. 2021, the Ministry of Commerce published the “Guiding Opinions on Establishing the Internal Compliance Mechanism for Export Control by Export Operators of Dual-Use Items” (关于两用物项出口经营者建立出口管制内部合规机制的指导意见) (hereinafter referred to as the "2021 Guiding Opinions"), pushing export operators of dual-use items engaged in relevant acts under the Export Control Law and other subjects to establish an internal compliance mechanism for export control that is in line with their actual situation.

Having replaced the “Guiding Opinions on Establishing the Internal Export Control Mechanism by Export Operators of Dual-Use Items and Technologies” (关于两用物项和技术出口经营者建立内部出口控制机制的指导意见) (Announcement of the Ministry of Commerce No.69 [2007]), the 2021 Guiding Opinions further improves the basic elements of export operators’ internal compliance system and adds the annex “Guidelines for Internal Compliance of Dual-use Items Export Control” (the“Guidelines”,两用物项出口管制内部合规指南) to provide more detailed guidance for the compliance of export operators.

According to the Guidelines, a sound internal compliance system for export control comprises nine basic elements: drafting a policy statement, establishing an organizational structure, conducting a comprehensive risk assessment, formulating review procedures, developing emergency measures, providing education and training, improving compliance audits, retaining archival materials and preparing management manuals.

 

 

Cover Photo by Chastagner Thierry (https://unsplash.com/@chasta03) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)