China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

PBOC Bans Marketing Services for Virtual Currency Business

Fri, 06 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 6 July 2021, the General Administration Office of the People's Bank of China (PBOC) and Beijing Municipal Finance Bureau jointly released the “Warning Statement of Preventing Risks in Virtual Currency Trading”(关于防范虚拟货币交易活动的风险提示), requiring relevant institutions not to provide relevant services for virtual currency business.

The two authorities warn relevant institutions within their jurisdiction that they shall not provide business premises, commercial display, marketing, and promotion, paid referral traffic, and other service for business activities related to virtual currencies. Financial institutions and payment institutions within their jurisdiction shall not directly or indirectly provide services related to virtual currencies for customers.

The two authorities also remind that recently, collaborating with the government of Huairou District, they have ordered the rectification and deregistration of Beijing Qudao Culture Development Co., Ltd. over its suspected involvement in providing software services for virtual currency trading, and have its website deactivated.

 

 

Cover Photo by Denny Ryanto (https://unsplash.com/@runninghead) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)