China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

PBOC Bans Marketing Services for Virtual Currency Business

Fri, 06 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 6 July 2021, the General Administration Office of the People's Bank of China (PBOC) and Beijing Municipal Finance Bureau jointly released the “Warning Statement of Preventing Risks in Virtual Currency Trading”(关于防范虚拟货币交易活动的风险提示), requiring relevant institutions not to provide relevant services for virtual currency business.

The two authorities warn relevant institutions within their jurisdiction that they shall not provide business premises, commercial display, marketing, and promotion, paid referral traffic, and other service for business activities related to virtual currencies. Financial institutions and payment institutions within their jurisdiction shall not directly or indirectly provide services related to virtual currencies for customers.

The two authorities also remind that recently, collaborating with the government of Huairou District, they have ordered the rectification and deregistration of Beijing Qudao Culture Development Co., Ltd. over its suspected involvement in providing software services for virtual currency trading, and have its website deactivated.

 

 

Cover Photo by Denny Ryanto (https://unsplash.com/@runninghead) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.