China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SASAC Issues Rules on Board of Directors of Central State-Owned Enterprises

Wed, 20 Oct 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC) issued the “Working Rules of the Board of Directors of Central State-Owned Enterprises (for Trial Implementation)” (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”, 中央企业董事会工作规则(试行)) to stipulate provisions or requirements for further strengthening the development of the board of directors of central state-owned enterprises.

The Rules is applicable to wholly state-owned central enterprises in which the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the SASAC performs its duties as a contributor, and it also serves as guidelines for other central state-owned enterprises with diversified shareholding, enterprises affiliated to central state-owned enterprises, and local state-owned enterprises.

The Rules clarifies that the board of directors is the main decision-making body of a company, and the board of directors shall, in accordance with the statutory procedures and the articles of association, make decisions on important business management matters, such as business plans, significant investment and financing matters, annual financial budget, and settlement, important reform schemes, etc.

The Rules, by drawing lessons from the OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises, emphasizes the supervising role of the board of directors. The Rules makes it clear that the board of directors shall strengthen its management and supervision of the management level, and imposes requirements on directors in protecting the interests of state-owned capitals, implementing the intent of capital contributors, and urging the board of directors to operate in a regularized and effective manner when making decisions. The Rules further standardizes and clarifies the provisions such as the board of directors’ reporting important situations to the capital contributors and the directors’ reporting abnormal situations to the capital contributors.

 

 

Cover Photo by Peter Zhou (https://unsplash.com/@zhoup) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)