China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Selection and Appointment of People's Assessors Makes Great Progress

Fri, 13 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

According to the official social media account of the Ministry of Justice on 15 July 2021, China’s People's Assessor Law has achieved good results since its entry into force in April 2018. To date, the total number of people’s assessors nationwide has exceeded 316,000, about 50% more than before. Compared with the past, people's assessors come from a wider range of sources now, with a further balance between their gender ratio and occupational distribution, and an increasingly reasonable educational background and age structure. Being more extensive and representative, people's assessors are playing a more and more important role in participating in and supervising the administration of justice.

Pursuant to the People's Assessor Law, a citizen shall have the right and obligation to serve as a people's assessor. A people's assessor may participate in judicial activities and voice his opinions independently. A people's assessor may participate in a three-person or seven-person collegial bench. In a three-person collegial bench, a people's assessor may independently voice his or her opinions on the fact-finding or the application of law, and exercise his or her voting right. In a seven-person collegial bench, a people's assessor may independently voice his or her opinions on the fact-finding and exercise his or her voting right together with the judges. As to the application of law, the people's assessor may voice his or her opinions, but may not cast a vote. The selection and appointment of people's assessors shall mainly be based on random selection and supplemented by individual applications and recommendations by organizations.

 

 

Cover Photo by Robynne Hu (https://unsplash.com/@robynnexy) on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.

SPC’s 2024 Typical IP Cases Include AI Face-Swap Ruling

In April 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court released eight typical IP cases, highlighting judicial responses to emerging issues in AI, gaming, and biotech, including a landmark ruling on AI face-swapping copyright infringement.

China Eases Tax Refunds to Boost Inbound Tourist Spending

In 2025, China has lowered its departure tax refund threshold from 500 RMB to 200 RMB and doubled cash refund limits to 20,000 RMB while expanding eligible stores and streamlining processes, aiming to boost inbound tourism spending and promote Chinese products.

Chinese Courts Bolster Pregnant Workers' Rights Protection

In April 2025, China's Ministry of Human Resources and Supreme People's Court released typical labor dispute cases emphasizing stronger protection of pregnant employees' rights, including a case where unlawful job reassignment and salary reduction were ruled illegal.

China Revises Marriage Registration Regulation

China's revised marriage registration rules, effective May 2025, eliminate location restrictions, simplify procedures by removing hukou requirements, and align divorce processes with the Civil Code's cooling-off period.

China’s SPC Issues Foreign State Immunity Case Guidelines

In March 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued procedural guidelines for handling civil cases involving foreign state immunity, implementing the country's shift from absolute to restrictive immunity under the new Foreign State Immunity Law.