China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Selection and Appointment of People's Assessors Makes Great Progress

Fri, 13 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

According to the official social media account of the Ministry of Justice on 15 July 2021, China’s People's Assessor Law has achieved good results since its entry into force in April 2018. To date, the total number of people’s assessors nationwide has exceeded 316,000, about 50% more than before. Compared with the past, people's assessors come from a wider range of sources now, with a further balance between their gender ratio and occupational distribution, and an increasingly reasonable educational background and age structure. Being more extensive and representative, people's assessors are playing a more and more important role in participating in and supervising the administration of justice.

Pursuant to the People's Assessor Law, a citizen shall have the right and obligation to serve as a people's assessor. A people's assessor may participate in judicial activities and voice his opinions independently. A people's assessor may participate in a three-person or seven-person collegial bench. In a three-person collegial bench, a people's assessor may independently voice his or her opinions on the fact-finding or the application of law, and exercise his or her voting right. In a seven-person collegial bench, a people's assessor may independently voice his or her opinions on the fact-finding and exercise his or her voting right together with the judges. As to the application of law, the people's assessor may voice his or her opinions, but may not cast a vote. The selection and appointment of people's assessors shall mainly be based on random selection and supplemented by individual applications and recommendations by organizations.

 

 

Cover Photo by Robynne Hu (https://unsplash.com/@robynnexy) on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.

SPC’s 2024 Typical IP Cases Include AI Face-Swap Ruling

In April 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court released eight typical IP cases, highlighting judicial responses to emerging issues in AI, gaming, and biotech, including a landmark ruling on AI face-swapping copyright infringement.