China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Courts Adjust Centralized Juridiction over IP cases - China Legal News

Sat, 16 Jan 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

In December 2020, Shanghai High People's Court issued the Announcement on Adjusting the Centralized Jurisdiction of Primary Courts over Intellectual Property Cases.

On 18 Dec. 2020, Shanghai High People's Court issued the Announcement on Adjusting the Centralized Jurisdiction of Primary Courts over Intellectual Property Cases (关于调整本市基层法院知识产权案件集中管辖的公告), which came into force from 1 Jan. 2021.

The Announcement makes it clear that intellectual property cases accepted by primary people's courts shall be subject to relatively centralized jurisdiction and shall be tried by the people's courts of Pudong New Area, Xuhui District, Yangpu District and Putuo District of Shanghai Municipality. For other jurisdictions, the Announcement of Shanghai High People's Court on Adjusting the Centralized Jurisdiction of Primary Courts over Intellectual Property Cases, Administrative Cases and Minor Criminal Cases (上海市高级人民法院关于调整基层法院知识产权案件、行政案件和未成年人刑事案件集中管辖的公告) shall still apply.

Contributors: Yanru Chen 陈彦茹

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)