China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Courts’ New Rules Support Opening-up of Financial Sector - China Legal News

Tue, 08 Dec 2020
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

On 23 Nov. 2020, Shanghai High People’s Court issued the “Several Opinions on Shanghai Court Serving and Safeguarding the Further Expansion of the Opening of the Financial Industry” (上海法院服务保障进一步扩大金融业对外开放若干意见) (“the Opinions”) and six typical cases of foreign-related financial disputes in a press conference.

The Opinions are in both Chinese and English. There are 24 articles in total and the Opinions are divided into four parts, including:

(1) the overall requirements of providing judicial service safeguard for the further expansion of the financial industry’s opening-up;

(2) the establishment and improvement of judicial systems and mechanisms that are compatible with the further expansion of the financial industry’s opening-up;

(3) strengthening trial and enforcement of related disputes; and

(4) giving full play to the coordinated governance role of justice in the further expansion of the financial industry.

The six typical cases reported at the press conference included financial derivative transactions, recognition and enforcement of Hong Kong judgments involving Keepwell Deeds, and disputes concerning letters of credit, independent guarantees, export credit insurance, etc. These cases embodied the Shanghai court’s consistent judicial position of upholding equal protection of the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese and foreign entities, respecting international transaction rules and international financial practices, and handling foreign-related financial cases in a fair and efficient manner.

 

Contributors: Yanru Chen 陈彦茹

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.