China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Issues 2020 White Paper on Administrative Trials and Typical Cases

Wed, 25 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 19 July 2021, Shanghai High People's Court held a press release to brief the situation of administrative trials in Shanghai in 2020. The Court issued the White Paper on Administrative Trials in Shanghai in 2020 (“the White Paper”), and typical cases in terms of substantive settlement of administrative disputes and administrative trials handled by Shanghai courts in 2020.

The White Paper indicates that in 2020, all courts in Shanghai accepted 5,109 administrative cases of first instance and concluded 5,129 administrative cases of first instance in total. Among them, 1,974 administrative cases were resolved through coordination and reconciliation in the first-instance and second-instance cases. In 2020, heads of administrative organs have responded to 1,460 lawsuits in court, up 16.7% year-on-year; and the rate of heads of administrative organs appearing in court is 47.8%, up 7.9% year-on-year.

Typical cases cover work safety, eco-environmental protection, market regulation, housing registration, determination of work-related injuries, public security law enforcement, and civil affairs management, etc.

 

 

Cover Photo by Elya Foll (https://unsplash.com/@suslik) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.