China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Issues Guidelines for Trial of Financial Cases Involving Foreign Jurisdictions

Fri, 20 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 July 2021, Shanghai Financial Court issued the “Guidelines of Shanghai Financial Court for the Trial of Financial Cases Involving Foreign Countries, Hong Kong, Macao or Taiwan” (hereinafter referred to as the “Guidelines”, 上海金融法院涉外、涉港澳台金融案件审判指南), as well as eight typical cases of financial disputes involving foreign jurisdictions.

The Guidelines consists of four parts, clarifying the procedural and substantive issues of the trial of foreign-related financial cases. Part One deals with the procedural issues of foreign-related financial cases, covering nine elements, such as jurisdiction, judicial review of the validity of arbitration agreement, case filing, periods and service, preservation, examination of the overseas parties and evidence, extraterritorial investigation, and evidence collection. Part Two involves the application of law for foreign-related financial cases. Part Three introduces the recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments and arbitral awards for foreign-related financial cases. Part Four is the appendix, including the format for drafting legal instruments for foreign-related financial cases, and common international conventions, practices, and industry rules commonly used in the trial of foreign-related financial cases.

The Guidelines may serve as a reference book for the trial of foreign-related financial cases, providing judges with guidelines for hearing financial cases involving foreign countries, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan, and also providing clear solutions for the financial disputes of the same kind.

The eight typical cases involve financial derivatives transactions, shareholding entrustment, independent letter of guarantee, judicial review of foreign arbitration, preservation, application for enforcement of foreign-related judgments, and other areas.

 

 

Cover Photo by Merlin Kraus (https://unsplash.com/@merlin_amadeus_) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)