China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Issues Guidelines for Trial of Financial Cases Involving Foreign Jurisdictions

Fri, 20 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 July 2021, Shanghai Financial Court issued the Guidelines of Shanghai Financial Court for the Trial of Financial Cases Involving Foreign Countries, Hong Kong, Macao or Taiwan (hereinafter referred to as the “Guidelines”, 上海金融法院涉外、涉港澳台金融案件审判指南), as well as eight typical cases of financial disputes involving foreign jurisdictions.

The Guidelines consists of four parts, clarifying the procedural and substantive issues of the trial of foreign-related financial cases. Part One deals with the procedural issues of foreign-related financial cases, covering nine elements, such as jurisdiction, judicial review of the validity of arbitration agreement, case filing, periods and service, preservation, examination of the overseas parties and evidence, extraterritorial investigation, and evidence collection. Part Two involves the application of law for foreign-related financial cases. Part Three introduces the recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments and arbitral awards for foreign-related financial cases. Part Four is the appendix, including the format for drafting legal instruments for foreign-related financial cases, and common international conventions, practices, and industry rules commonly used in the trial of foreign-related financial cases.

The Guidelines may serve as a reference book for the trial of foreign-related financial cases, providing judges with guidelines for hearing financial cases involving foreign countries, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan, and also providing clear solutions for the financial disputes of the same kind.

The eight typical cases involve financial derivatives transactions, shareholding entrustment, independent letter of guarantee, judicial review of foreign arbitration, preservation, application for enforcement of foreign-related judgments, and other areas.

 

 

Cover Photo by Merlin Kraus (https://unsplash.com/@merlin_amadeus_) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.