China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shenzhen Issues China's First Guidelines for Personal Bankruptcy Filings

Mon, 27 Jun 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 17 May 2022, the Shenzhen Bankruptcy Tribunal issued the “Opinions on Enhancing Individual Bankruptcy Filings and Reviews” (《加强个人破产申请与审查工作的实施意见》, hereinafter referred to as the “Opinions”) to prevent misuse of personal bankruptcy.

The Opinions aims to “close the loopholes of the personal bankruptcy system” and ensure that “the door to debt relief through personal bankruptcy is open only to honest and unfortunate debtors.”

According to the Opinions, debtors must fully and truthfully declare the reasons for personal debts, household income level, current property status, and other necessary information to the court, and accept inquiries from the court and verification by creditors, so as to prove their “honesty” and “misfortune” with objective evidence.

If the applicant for personal bankruptcy provides false or falsified materials, declares inaccurate information, or makes false or misleading statements, thus causing people’s courts to render a judgment, the applicant shall bear corresponding legal liabilities.

So far, Shenzhen is the first and only place in China to establish a personal bankruptcy system, so it can be said that this city is an incubator for exploring the personal bankruptcy system in China.

 

 

Cover Photo by Darmau Lee on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.