China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shenzhen’s Foreign, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan-Related Family Court Holds Its First Hearing

Mon, 10 Oct 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On the morning of 25 Aug. 2022, the Shenzhen Family Trial Center Involving Hong Kong-Macao-Taiwan and Foreign Factors (深圳涉外涉港澳台家事审判中心, hereinafter the “Family Court”) within Longhua Primary People’s Court of Shenzhen trialed its first cross-border family law dispute.

The above-mentioned dispute is a divorce case, with a Hong Kong resident as the plaintiff. Considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the judge, with the consent of both parties, held the hearing at the Internet Tribunal of the Family Court. The hearing was conducted online via an applet called ‘Shenzhen Mobile Mini Court’, enabling the plaintiff in Hong Kong to participate in the proceedings.

The Family Court was established on 6 July 2022 within Longhua Primary People’s Court of Shenzhen. It has jurisdiction over all foreign, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan-related family cases in Shenzhen.

In recent years, the Chinese government has tended to authorize some courts to exercise centralized jurisdiction over a specific type of cases within a particular territory, which goes beyond the tradition of territorial jurisdiction to some extent.

 

 

Photo by Filippo Cesarini on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.