China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC & SPP Targets Crimes of Refusing to Comply with Court Judgments

Thu, 23 Jan 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 18 Nov. 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) jointly issued the “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Refusal to Comply with Judgments or Rulings” (关于办理拒不执行判决、裁定刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释, hereinafter the “Interpretation”), which came into force on 1 Dec. 2024. The Interpretation aims to combat the criminal offense of refusing to comply with judgments, safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of judgment creditors.

According to Chinese Criminal Law, individuals obligated to comply with court judgment, such as judgment debtors, auxiliary obligors, and guarantors, who are capable of execution but refuse to comply under serious circumstances can be convicted of refusal to comply with judgments or rulings.

Related Posts:

The highlights of the Interpretation are as follows.

  • The circumstances of “capable of execution but refusing to comply under grave circumstances” include maliciously disposing of assets by abandoning claims or collateral, extending debt repayment deadlines, or using false settlements or transfers to hinder the execution of judgments or rulings.
  • Hiding or transferring assets before the judgment takes effect, which is later verified and ignored when enforcement is sought, may result in prosecution for refusal to comply with judgments or rulings.
  • Refusal to comply with judgments or rulings on the payment of alimony, child support, compensation for injuries, medical costs, or wages, when constituting a crime, shall be subject to harsher penalties in accordance with the law.

 

 

Photo by JM Lova on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)