China Justice Observer


EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Asserts China's Global Jurisdiction in OPPO-Interdigital SEP Licensing Fee Battle

Wed, 15 Nov 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 4 Sept. 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a final ruling of jurisdiction challenge on the second instance in the standard essential patent (SEP) licensing fee dispute between the appellants, Interdigital Inc. and Interdigital Holdings Inc. (hereinafter collectively “Interdigital”), and the appellees, Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Co., Ltd., and Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Co., Ltd. Shenzhen Branch (hereinafter collectively “OPPO”).

In its ruling, the SPC denied Interdigital’s appeal and upheld the first instance ruling (2022) Yue 73 Min Chu No. 195 ((2022)粤73民初195号) issued by the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court, thus confirming that the Chinese courts have jurisdiction over global SEP licensing fee disputes.

This is another decision by the SPC confirming Chinese courts’ jurisdiction over global SEP licensing fee disputes, following the cases of OPPO v. Sharp and OPPO v. Nokia.

Related Post:

In January 2022, OPPO filed a lawsuit with the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court requesting to confirm that the SEPs which Interdigital holds or has the right to license satisfy the global license conditions under FRAND terms with respect to OPPO.

On 17 Jan. 2022, the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court accepted the case. During the defense period, Interdigital raised a jurisdictional objection.

The Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court issued the civil ruling (2022) Yue 73 Min Chu No. 195 on 13 Jan. 2023, rejecting Interdigital’s jurisdictional objection. Interdigital appealed against the first instance decision to the SPC.

The SPC held that this dispute has a proper connection to China, whether as the place where patent rights are granted, where patents are implemented, where negotiations for the concerning SEP licensing occur, or where the contract can reasonably be expected to be performed. As such, Chinese courts have unquestionable jurisdiction over this case.



Photo by Miranda Richey on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Charts Future in Tech: Big Moves in Computing Power Infrastructure

In October 2023, China released the “Action Plan for the High-Quality Development of Computing Power Infrastructure”, a comprehensive plan for the high-quality development of computing power infrastructure, targeting over 300 EFLOPS computing scale and 1,800 EB storage volume by 2025.

China Enhances Sci-Tech Ethics Oversight

In October 2023, China introduced new measures - the “Measures for Scientific and Technological Ethics Review (for Trial Implementation)” - to tighten ethical oversight of scientific and technological activities, focusing on research involving humans, animals, and areas with potential ethical risks.

China 2022 Overseas Investment: 47K Enterprises, USD 3.5T Revenue

In September 2023, the “2022 Statistical Bulletin of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment” was released, showing that in the year of 2022, China's overseas investment reached 47,000 enterprises, contributing USD 75 billion in taxes and achieving USD 3.5 trillion in sales revenue.