China Justice Observer


EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Asserts China's Global Jurisdiction in OPPO-Interdigital SEP Licensing Fee Battle

Wed, 15 Nov 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 4 Sept. 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a final ruling of jurisdiction challenge on the second instance in the standard essential patent (SEP) licensing fee dispute between the appellants, Interdigital Inc. and Interdigital Holdings Inc. (hereinafter collectively “Interdigital”), and the appellees, Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Co., Ltd., and Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Co., Ltd. Shenzhen Branch (hereinafter collectively “OPPO”).

In its ruling, the SPC denied Interdigital’s appeal and upheld the first instance ruling (2022) Yue 73 Min Chu No. 195 ((2022)粤73民初195号) issued by the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court, thus confirming that the Chinese courts have jurisdiction over global SEP licensing fee disputes.

This is another decision by the SPC confirming Chinese courts’ jurisdiction over global SEP licensing fee disputes, following the cases of OPPO v. Sharp and OPPO v. Nokia.

Related Post:

In January 2022, OPPO filed a lawsuit with the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court requesting to confirm that the SEPs which Interdigital holds or has the right to license satisfy the global license conditions under FRAND terms with respect to OPPO.

On 17 Jan. 2022, the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court accepted the case. During the defense period, Interdigital raised a jurisdictional objection.

The Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court issued the civil ruling (2022) Yue 73 Min Chu No. 195 on 13 Jan. 2023, rejecting Interdigital’s jurisdictional objection. Interdigital appealed against the first instance decision to the SPC.

The SPC held that this dispute has a proper connection to China, whether as the place where patent rights are granted, where patents are implemented, where negotiations for the concerning SEP licensing occur, or where the contract can reasonably be expected to be performed. As such, Chinese courts have unquestionable jurisdiction over this case.



Photo by Miranda Richey on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Unveils 2023 IP Protection Report

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Court(SPC) released its 2023 report on intellectual property protection, highlighting a 3.41% increase in accepted cases, and a 117% rise in punitive damages awarded.

SPC Publishes Typical Cases on Public Security Crimes

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases illustrating crimes against public security, emphasizing clarifications on trial criteria and sentencing principles, featuring a case involving serious injuries from objects thrown off a high-rise building.

Beijing Court Upholds Workers' Right to Offline Rest

The Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People's Court ruled that workers are entitled to overtime pay for “invisible overtime work” conducted via social media outside of working hours, protecting their right to “offline rest”.

China Revises State Secrets Protection Law

China’s national legislature, the National People’s Congress, revised the State Secrets Protection Law to enhance information classification, secrecy in technological innovation, and precise protection of state secrets, effective May 1, 2024.