China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Issues 2020 Typical Cases on Maritime Trial

Thu, 16 Sep 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 17 Aug. 2021, China’s Supreme People's Court (SPC) published the “Typical Cases of National Maritime Trial in 2020” (2020年全国海事审判典型案例). The ten typical cases cover disputes over compensation for damages to natural resources and ecological environment, and liability for ship collision.

Among these cases, the case Winship Maritime Inc. v. China Shipping Industry Co., Ltd. and Cosco Shipping Heavy Industry (Yangzhou) Co., Ltd. Concerning the dispute over shipbuilding commission contract ((2019) Hu 72 Min Chu No. 256, 胜船海事公司与中海工业有限公司、扬州中远海运重工有限公司船舶建造佣金合同纠纷案) indicates the active exploration of Chinese courts in the ascertainment of foreign law. During the court trial, after the explanations made by the court, each party concerned provided the relevant precedents of English law, declared to have exhausted the search, and confirmed together dozens of relevant precedents which may apply to this case. Then, the Court concluded the applicable ruling rules under English law according to the rank and time effect of the precedents and the matching degree with the case. These rules involve principles of contract interpretation, freedom of contract, and honesty and credibility under English law (common law) and the handling of commission contracts, responding to the reasonable expectations the parties had about the outcome of the dispute resolution when they choose the applicable law.

 

 

Cover Photo by yee yek (https://unsplash.com/@yekyee) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.