China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Issues Judicial Interpretation (II) on Marriage Law, Covers Fraudulent Divorce & Live-streaming Gifts

Tue, 01 Apr 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 15 Jan. 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the “Interpretation on the Application of the Marriage and Family Part of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China (II)” (hereinafter the “Interpretation (II)”, 关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法典〉婚姻家庭编的解释(二)) along with typical cases, providing guidance on the application of law in the areas of marriage, family, and property.

Over the past three years, Chinese courts have concluded approximately 2 million marriage and family cases annually, accounting for about 12 percent of all first-instance civil cases. Among these, divorce dispute cases amount to approximately 1.5 million annually, representing nearly 80 percent of all family cases.

The Interpretation (II) contains 23 articles that take a problem-oriented approach, addressing common issues such as malicious debt evasion through divorce, parental contributions to children’s post-marriage housing purchases, and rewards on live streaming platforms.

Highlights include:

  • If a debtor maliciously evades debt through divorce, creditors may refer to Articles 538 or 539 of the Civil Code regarding creditors’ right of revocation to request the revocation of relevant property division clauses in the divorce agreement to protect their legitimate rights and interests.
  • If one spouse, through bigamy, cohabitation with others, or other circumstances that violate public order and good morals, gives away or transfers community property to others at a manifestly unreasonable low price, the other spouse may claim that the contract is invalid and demand the return of property according to law.
  • If one spouse, without the consent of the other, rewards hosts through live streaming platforms, which clearly exceeds the family’s general consumption level and seriously harms the interests of the community property, it may be determined as “squandering of community property”. The other spouse may request division of community property during the marriage, or request that the rewarding spouse receive less or no share during divorce property division.

 

 

Photo by Jay on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.