China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Issues Juridical Interpretation on Online Consumer Disputes

Tue, 29 Mar 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 1 March 2022, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued “Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Hearing Cases Involving Online Consumer Disputes (I)” (hereinafter “the Provisions”, 关于审理网络消费纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定(一)), with effect from 15 March 2022.

The Provisions incorporates 20 articles, mainly regulating online consumption contracts, liabilities in live-streaming marketing, and takeaway catering services. The key points are as follows.

1. Regulating standard clauses of online consumption contracts

Article 1 of the Provisions lists commonly-seen standard clauses unfair or unreasonable to consumers and declares them invalid. Such clauses include, “signing for the receipt of goods representing by default the goods have acceptable quality” and “the business operators’ unilateral interpretation, or the final interpretation, of the contract terms.”

2. Clarifying the responsibility of e-commerce platforms

E-commerce platforms shall bear the responsibility as the product seller or service provider when conducting self-operated business. This responsibility also applies to the situation when the e-commerce platform is not de facto a self-operated business but its trademark is sufficient to mislead consumers to believe that it is self-operated.  

3. Clarifying the liability in live-streaming marketing

When the employees of a business operator conduct false advertising or other conduct causing damages to consumers, the people’s court shall support the consumers’ claim that the business operator on the e-commerce platforms is liable to compensate for such damages.

 

 

Cover Photo by Kaiwen Zhao on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.

SPC’s 2024 Typical IP Cases Include AI Face-Swap Ruling

In April 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court released eight typical IP cases, highlighting judicial responses to emerging issues in AI, gaming, and biotech, including a landmark ruling on AI face-swapping copyright infringement.