China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Issues New Rules on Punitive Damages in Eco-environmental Tort Disputes

Tue, 15 Feb 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 12 Jan. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the “Interpretation on the Application of Punitive Damages in Cases Involving Eco-environmental Infringement Disputes” (hereinafter “the Interpretation”, 最高人民法院关于审理生态环境侵权纠纷案件适用惩罚性赔偿的解释), taking effect on 20 Jan. 2022.

Generally speaking, in case of an infringement, the infringer shall be liable for compensatory damages and the amount shall be limited to the actual damage incurred. This is also known as the rule of compensation. 

However, since the Civil Code (民法典) came into effect in 2021, China has added provisions on punitive damages in several areas, such as intellectual property infringement and eco-environmental infringement. It suggests that China has adopted a more serious approach towards such behaviors in recent years.

The Interpretation, based on the Civil Code, provides specific regulations on how courts should apply its provisions.

For example, according to the Interpretation, the amount of punitive damages should be calculated based on the amount of compensation for personal injury and property damage incurred by environmental pollution and ecological damage.

When determining the amount of punitive damages, the people’s courts should take full account of factors including the degree of maliciousness of the infringer, the severity of the consequences of the infringement, the benefits obtained by the infringer, and the repair measures and effects taken by the infringer afterward. The amount shall not exceed twice the base number.

 

 

Cover Photo by Cullen Zh on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.