China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Issues Report (2019-21) on One-stop Diversified Dispute Resolution and Litigation Service System

Mon, 28 Mar 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 24 Feb. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the “Report on the Construction of a One-stop Diversified Dispute Resolution and Litigation Service System (2019-2021)” (hereinafter “the Report”, 人民一站式多元纠纷解决和诉讼服务体系建设(2019—2021)) and ten typical cases of online mediation.

It summarizes the work of people’s courts in promoting diversified dispute resolution since 2019.

The one-stop diversified dispute resolution refers to the collaboration between courts and other mediation institutions to provide parties with choices between mediation and litigation in the court’s Litigation Service Center.

The drive for Chinese courts in promoting the mechanism is to reduce the caseload of the courts, aiming to alleviate the pressure brought up by the litigation explosion.

The SPC suggests that the goals set up three years ago have already been achieved.

For example, in 2021, 6,106,800 disputes were solved before litigation through mediation, a year-on-year spike of 43.86%; also courts across the country have established mediation platforms with a usage rate of 100%, having handled over 24 million cases through online mediation.

 

 

Cover Photo by Federico Mata on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.