China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases Second Batch of Typical Cases Concerning Administrative Agreements

Wed, 25 May 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 20 Apr. 2022, the Supreme People’s Court released the second batch of ten typical cases concerning administrative agreements.

According to the “Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Cases Related to Administrative Agreements” (《关于审理行政协议案件若干问题的规定》) — a judicial interpretation released in 2019 — the administrative agreement refers to the agreement signed by administrative agencies with citizens, legal persons or other organizations for the purpose of administrative management or public service, which contains the rights and obligations prescribed by the administrative law.

Administrative agreements usually fall into the following types.

(1) Government concession agreements;

(2) Agreements on compensation for expropriation and requisition of land, housing, and so on;

(3) Agreements on the transfer of mineral rights or other rights to use state-owned natural resources;

(4) Agreements on the lease, sale, and purchase of government-invested affordable housing.

(5) Agreements on cooperation between the government and social capital conforming to the above definition of the administrative agreements; and

(6) Other administrative agreements.

 

 

Cover Photo by Chongming Liu on Unsplash

 
 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.