China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases Typical Cases Involving COVID-19 Epidemic-related Crimes

Mon, 20 Jun 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 9 Apr. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released five typical cases involving crimes against COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control.

The typical cases involve behaviors jeopardizing the prevention and control of infectious diseases, inbound passengers failing to fill in health declaration forms truthfully, acts of making and selling false nucleic acid test reports, offenders assaulting police officers at vaccination sites, as well as fabrication and deliberate spread of false epidemic information.

While the Omicron variants have brought new challenges to the epidemic prevention and control in China, crimes against COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control, such as refusing to implement epidemic prevention measures, obstructing official duties, and falsifying nucleic acid test reports, have made the situation even worse, states the SPC. Therefore, the SPC released these typical cases as a reference for local courts to handle similar cases.

 

 

Cover Photo by Loeng Lig on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)