China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases Typical Cases Involving People’s Assessors

Thu, 24 Apr 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 Feb. 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released the second batch of seven typical cases involving people’s assessors in trials, highlighting their role in major cases concerning public interest and ethical controversies.

In cases that drew widespread public attention in China, such as the Chongqing Siblings Falling Death Case and the Yu Huaying Child Trafficking Case (involving 17 children), the people’s court formed seven-member collegial panels composed of four people’s assessors and three judges. They analyzed the cases from the perspectives of public order, good customs, and ethical standards.

The typical cases also reflect the intersection between professional fields and public interest. For instance, in a work-related injury determination case where an employee of a laboratory animal breeding institution was infected with the herpes B virus, an assessor with a medical background provided an independent opinion from the perspective of occupational risk. This helped the court reach a judgment that balanced professional expertise with the common public understanding.

Since the implementation of the People’s Assessors Law in 2018, Chinese courts have appointed 341,000 people’s assessors, more than three times the number of primary court judges. By the end of 2024, assessors had participated in concluding 14.06 million first-instance cases, including 35,000 major cases heard under the seven-member collegial panel model.

 

 

Photo by Jason An on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.