China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases Typical Cases on AI Voice, Face-Swapping & Cyberbullying

Wed, 03 Sep 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 12 June 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released six typical cases involving the use of the internet and information technology to infringe upon personality rights, highlighting the judicial practice of courts in protecting personality rights.

These cases address issues such as facial identity theft, AI voice cloning, and cyberbullying, reflecting courts’ responses to torts related to emerging technologies.

Among them, two cases involve the abuse of AI technology. In one case, a dubbing company used AI to replicate Yin’s voice for profit without permission, and the court found the company liable for infringing upon Yin’s personality rights. In another case, a software company developed a “face-swapping” app using Peng’s portrait, and the court held that this constituted infringement of portrait rights.

Two other cases demonstrate the severe punishment of cyberbullying and data crimes. In Case No.4, Meng and Gao publicly disclosed Chen’s personal information through fan accounts and incited cyberbullying against Chen, damaging his reputation. The court found them guilty of infringing upon reputation rights and ordered them to delete the information, apologize, and compensate for losses. In Case No.5, Xu and Li were convicted of the crime of infringing on citizens’ personal information by illegally buying and selling more than 130 sets of citizen data containing facial information for profit, and were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment with fines respectively.

 

 

Photo by sj on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.