China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Consumer Protection

Mon, 18 Apr 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 15 March 2022, the official website of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released the typical cases on the protection of consumer rights and interests.

Typical cases are not binding but can affect judges’ opinions. Moreover, the SPC also seeks to guide the public expectations by issuing typical cases. Please see our articles for more information on the case system in China.

The 10 newly-released typical cases include medical aesthetics services, photography contracts involving college loans, the loss of wedding photos and videos, the refund for prepaid services, housing consumption, the reminder and interpretation of standard clauses in online consumption, consequences of online shopping assistants’ behaviors, transfer of second-hand goods, seller commitments, consumer information protection, etc.

For example, in the case of consumer Wu against an operating company of a travel app in a network service dispute, Wu argued that the payment stated in the contract was due after checking into the hotel, but the company argued that it had indicated the payment method in the contract was changed into required prepayment. The court held that the exceptions in the standard clauses should be sufficiently prominent, otherwise the consumer can claim such clause is not construed as part of the contract.

 

 

Cover Photo by Xin Bai on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (hereafter ‘PRC’) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.