China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Foreign Law Ascertainment

Tue, 17 Sep 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 10 July 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released the first batch of typical cases on the ascertainment and application of foreign laws, aiming to enhance the judiciary’s understanding of the “Judicial Interpretation on the Ascertainment of Foreign Law” issued in 2023.

Related Post:

This batch includes five typical cases covering issues such as company capital contributions, sales contracts, guarantee contracts, multimodal transportation contracts, and engineering supervision contracts. The laws ascertained include those of the United States, United Kingdom, Mexico, Tajikistan, and Hong Kong SAR.

For instance, Case No.1, “Zhao v. Jiang et al. (2006) Hu Gao Min Si (Shang) Zhong Zi No. 19,” involved a foreign-related dispute over company capital contribution, with the issue being whether Zhao held the status of a shareholder and director in Company M.

This dispute was adjudicated based on the law of where company M is registered (Delaware, USA), including relevant case law. During the trial, the parties presented expert legal opinions from U.S. law firms, providing relevant Delaware laws. The Chinese court examined the authenticity of the submitted excerpts from the Delaware General Corporation Law, Title 8, Chapter 1 of the Delaware Code, and relevant case law through online verification and cross-examination.

Ultimately, the Chinese court found, based on Delaware General Corporation Law and relevant case law, that Zhao had in fact become a shareholder and director of Company M.

 

 

Photo by Danyu Wang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.

China MOJ Boosts World-Class Arbitration Institutions

In 2025, China's Ministry of Justice (MOJ) launched an initiative to cultivate leading international arbitration institutions with Chinese characteristics, selecting 22 for the first batch amid growing global recognition of Chinese arbitration hubs.