China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Solicits Opinions on New Rules of Online Litigation - China Legal News

Sun, 07 Feb 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

In January 2021, China’s Supreme People’s Court issued the proposed  Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Cases Handled Online by the People’s Courts (Draft for Comment).

On Jan. 21, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the proposed Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Cases Handled Online by the People’s Courts (Draft for Comment) (the Provisions, 关于人民法院在线办理案件若干问题的规定(征求意见稿)), whose public comment period will close on 5 Feb. 2021.

In accordance with the Provisions, online litigation refers to the form of litigation where the courts, the parties concerned and other litigation participants rely on the electronic litigation platform to complete all or parts of the litigation process, such as prosecution, case registration, service, mediation, evidence exchange, inquiry, hearing, court trial, judgment rendering and case execution online via the Internet.

The online litigation activities conducted by the parties concerned have the same effect as regular litigation activities.

The courts shall establish an electronic litigation platform to carry out online proceedings.

The courts can handle civil and administrative litigation cases, cases of civil special procedures, cases of supervision and urge procedure, and cases of civil enforcement, administrative enforcement and civil enforcement collateral to criminal enforcement online, after taking the case situation, the parties’ wills and technical conditions into comprehensive consideration.

Contributors: Yanru Chen 陈彦茹

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)