China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Issues 29th Batch of Guiding Cases

Wed, 06 Oct 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 19 Aug. 2021, China’s Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) released the 29th batch of guiding cases, clarifying the procedures and methods in procuratorial public interest litigation.

There is a total of five guiding cases, covering issues relating to marine environment protection, preservation of natural relics and traditional villages, control of solid waste pollution, and prevention of high-speed rail safety hazards.

As one of the guiding cases, the administrative public interest litigation case concerning multi-region issues (Jian Li No.113, 检例第113号), presented how Zhengzhou Railway Transportation Branch of Henan People's Procuratorate supervised the rectification of illegal building of small reservoirs that endangered the operation safety of high-speed railways. According to the guiding case, the determination of the procuratorate’s jurisdiction over such cases shall take full account of the nature and field of the case, the extent of damage to the public interest, the authorities requiring coordination, and other factors. For the cases involving railway transportation across multiple administrative regions, which require coordination with the railway authorities, relevant local governments and their functional departments for the solution, a railway transportation branch of people’s procuratorate may be designated for jurisdiction.

 

 

Cover Photo by Harry cao (https://unsplash.com/@mugeinsky) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (hereafter ‘PRC’) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.