China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Issues Rules on Supervision of Civil Proceedings by People's Procuratorates

Thu, 26 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 26 July 2021, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate released the “Rules on the Supervision of Civil Proceedings by People's Procuratorates” (“the Rules”, 人民检察院民事诉讼监督规则). The Rules consists of ten chapters, including investigation and verification, suspension and termination of examination, supervision over binding judgments, rulings and settlement statements, etc. The Rules has been implemented as of 1 Aug. 2021, and simultaneously the Rules on the Supervision of Civil Proceedings by People's Procuratorates (for Trial Implementation)” (人民检察院民事诉讼监督规则(试行)) was repealed.

Pursuant to the Rules, sham litigation is included in the scope of cases in which procuratorates may initiate supervisory proceedings ex officio. If, in the course of performing duties, the procuratorate suspects that a civil case involves sham litigation, regardless of whether the party has applied to the court for adjudication supervision, the procuratorate may initiate supervisory proceedings ex officio, which makes it more efficient to investigate and crack down on the sham litigation.

 

 

Cover Photo by Dendy (https://unsplash.com/@dnd_tjhai) on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.