China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Issues Rules on Supervision of Civil Proceedings by People's Procuratorates

Thu, 26 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 26 July 2021, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate released the “Rules on the Supervision of Civil Proceedings by People's Procuratorates” (“the Rules”, 人民检察院民事诉讼监督规则). The Rules consists of ten chapters, including investigation and verification, suspension and termination of examination, supervision over binding judgments, rulings and settlement statements, etc. The Rules has been implemented as of 1 Aug. 2021, and simultaneously the “Rules on the Supervision of Civil Proceedings by People's Procuratorates (for Trial Implementation)” (人民检察院民事诉讼监督规则(试行)) was repealed.

Pursuant to the Rules, sham litigation is included in the scope of cases in which procuratorates may initiate supervisory proceedings ex officio. If, in the course of performing duties, the procuratorate suspects that a civil case involves sham litigation, regardless of whether the party has applied to the court for adjudication supervision, the procuratorate may initiate supervisory proceedings ex officio, which makes it more efficient to investigate and crack down on the sham litigation.

 

 

Cover Photo by Dendy (https://unsplash.com/@dnd_tjhai) on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)