China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Promotes Corporate Compliance Non-Prosecution Work

Sat, 17 Jul 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 3 June 2021, China’s Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) released the “Guiding Opinions on Establishing a Third-Party Supervision and Evaluation Mechanism for the Compliance of Enterprises Involved in Cases (for Trial Implementation)” (关于建立涉案企业合规第三方监督评估机制的指导意见(试行)) and Typical Cases concerning the pilot reform of corporate compliance, thus providing pilot procuratorates with guidance on the corporate compliance non-prosecution work.

"Corporate compliance non-prosecution system" refers to a system under which prosecutors can order enterprises suspected of crimes to propose a special compliance plan according to the facts of crimes, urge them to establish the corporate compliance management system, and then make a non-prosecution decision as appropriate, where they find that such enterprises are willing to establish a compliance system. This system aims to urge the enterprises involved in cases to make compliance commitments and actively implement such commitments, promote enterprises to operate in compliance with the laws and regulations, and reduce and prevent crimes committed by enterprises. Driven by the SPP, China has been exploring and implementing this system.

Since March 2020, the SPP has launched the first phase of the pilot program in six primary-level procuratorates of Shanghai, Jiangsu, Shandong, and Guangdong.

In April 2021, the SPP issued the “Program for Carrying out Pilot Reform of Corporate Compliance” (关于开展企业合规改革试点工作的方案) (hereinafter referred to as the “Program”), which officially launched the second phase of the pilot reform of corporate compliance. The scope of the pilot program was expanded to ten provinces (municipalities), namely, Beijing, Liaoning, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Hubei, Hunan, and Guangdong. According to the Program, the specific pilot units would be determined by the aforesaid provincial-level procuratorates at their discretion, and each province (municipality) would designate one or two primary-level procuratorates as the pilot units.

 

Cover Photo by Ethan Wong (https://unsplash.com/@ethanwong) on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.