China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Releases Guiding Cases on Civil Adjudication Supervision

Thu, 08 May 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 13 Mar. 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) released the 56th batch of guiding cases, focusing on the supervision of effective civil judgments (also known as “supervision of civil adjudication”). These cases cover disputes such as private loans and traffic accident liability.

Supervision of effective civil judgments is one of the key functions of Chinese procuratorates, enabling them to correct erroneous court rulings, safeguard the legitimate rights of parties, and uphold judicial fairness.

For example, in the case Construction Company v. Huang and Zhang over a private loan dispute (Case No. 224), the Jiangxi Provincial People’s Procuratorate found that the Jiangxi High People’s Court had failed to proactively verify whether the guarantee period had expired, resulting in an erroneous judgment. Thus, the Procuratorate appealed the case to the SPP. After a thorough review of the debt repayment date, guarantee period, and other aspects, the SPP filed an appeal to China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC). The SPC ultimately adopted the appeal, and issued a retrial judgment that revoked the original first and second-instance judgments.

Statistics show that in 2024, Chinese procuratorates accepted over 280,000 civil prosecution cases, including more than 80,000 cases involving supervision of effective civil judgments, marking a year-on-year increase of 6%.

 

 

Photo by Hanson Lu on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)