China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Releases Ten Typical Cases of Supervising Administrative Proceedings in 2021

Mon, 28 Feb 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 24 Jan. 2022, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) released ten typical cases of administrative prosecution in 2021 on their official website.

In our earlier article “Don’t Forget the People’s Procuratorate When Resorting to China’s Judicial System”, we introduced the powers of the Procuratorate. Among others, supervising administrative proceedings is one of the procuratorates’ major powers.

That is, in the administrative proceedings where citizens, enterprises, and organizations sue the government, if the prosecutor finds that the effective judgment rendered by the court is incorrect, he can also lodge a protest and suggestion with the court just as his supervision in the civil litigation. Therefore, if you sue a local government of China in court and think that the court has not dealt fairly with the dispute between you and the government, you may consider resorting to the prosecutor.

The top ten cases released by the SPP all belong to the aforementioned type.

Specifically, the ten cases include supervising government information disclosure, administrative registration, work injury determination, administrative penalty,  administrative reconsideration, administrative compulsion, etc.

From these cases, one can learn how Chinese procuratorates supervise the government.

 

 

Cover Photo by  Li Yang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.