China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Releases Typical Cases of Public Interest Litigation to Protect Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Mon, 20 Jun 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 13 May 2022, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) and China Disabled Persons’ Federation jointly released ten typical cases of public interest litigation to protect the rights and interests of persons with disabilities.

The newly-released cases involve protecting the rights and interests of persons with disabilities in employment, barrier-free environment, education, rehabilitation, social security, cultural life, information security, and other aspects.

Among them, the following two cases are noteworthy.

1. The first case was against several employers in Guangzhou who posted “No Vacancy for Disabled Workers” in their online job advertisements, violating the fundamental rights of disabled people to equal participation in social life.

In response, the People’s Procuratorate of Huangpu District filed a public interest lawsuit against these employers, asking them to rectify the problem properly. Currently, the involved employers have removed the discriminatory content from their job advertisements.

2. In the second case, the People’s Procuratorate of a county in Zhejiang Province found that the information disclosure platform of the county’s Finance Bureau contained a large amount of unprocessed personal information of the disabled, including their ID card numbers, bank card numbers and types of disabilities.

In response, the Procuratorate issued procuratorial suggestions to the Finance Bureau, requesting it to de-identify the relevant information.

As we have introduced in our earlier post, “How China’s Procuratorates Conducts Public Interest Litigation?”, filing and reviewing public interest litigation is part of the main functions of China’s procuratorates. For more information on the functions of procuratorates, you can read the post “Don’t Forget the People’s Procuratorate When Resorting to China’s Judicial System”.

For now, China’s procuratorates at all levels have focused their primary efforts on public interest litigation cases concerning the rights and interests of people with disabilities.

 

 

Cover Photo by Joshua Fernandez on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.