China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Releases White Paper on Prosecutorial Practice for Minors (2021)

Mon, 11 Jul 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 1 Jun. 2022, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) released the “White Paper on Prosecutorial Practice for Minors (2021)” (hereinafter referred to as the “White Paper”). This is the third time that the SPP has released a white paper on the prosecutorial practice for minors.

In terms of crimes committed by minors, the White Paper reveals that:

1. In China, the arrest rate for juvenile suspects is 49.13%.

Chinese procuratorates are responsible for arrest approval.

In 2021, the procuratorates across the country accepted and examined the arrest requests involving a total of 55,379 juvenile criminal suspects, among which 27,208 were approved while 27,673 were dismissed. In other words, 49.13% of juvenile suspects were approved for arrest.

2. In China, the prosecution rate for juvenile suspects is 47.6%.

Chinese procuratorates also have the authority to examine applications from public security organs and decide whether to prosecute criminal suspects.

In 2021, the procuratorates across the country examined the applications for public prosecution against a total of 73,998 juvenile suspects, among which 35,228 were approved. In other words, 47.6% of juvenile suspects were prosecuted.

In terms of crimes against minors, the White Paper reveals that:

In 2021, the procuratorates across the country approved the arrest of 45,827 criminal suspects and prosecuted 60,553 for crimes against minors.

For more information on Chinese procuratorates, please click here.

 

 

Cover Photo by Jerry Bao on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.