China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Strengthens Cyberspace Governance

Tue, 30 Mar 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 25 Jan., the Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) held a press conference themed "giving full play to the procuratorial functions and promoting cyberspace governance" to introduce the current situation of procuratorial organs in punishing cybercrime and promoting the law-based governance of cyberspace, and to issue the Provisions on Handling Cybercrime Cases by the People’s Procuratorates (人民检察院办理网络犯罪案件规定) (hereinafter referred to as “the Provisions”) and typical cases of procuratorial organs in promoting cyberspace governance.

For the Provisions, "cybercrime" refers to crimes committed against information networks, crimes committed by making use of information networks, and other upstream and downstream crimes. The Provisions strengthens the regulation on the handling of cybercrime cases by the procuratorates in several aspects: the guidance on evidence collection and case review, the review of electronic data, procurators' appearance in court to support public prosecution, cross-region collaboration in handling cases, and transnational (cross-border) judicial collaboration.

At the same time, the SPP released 11 typical cases of promoting cyberspace governance by procuratorial organs at the press conference.

In recent years, the procuratorial organs have continuously intensified the efforts to crack down cybercrime. Since 2019, procuratorial organs have prosecuted over 50,000 cases of cybercrime and over 140,000 people in total.

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.