China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Suzhou International Commercial Court Launched

Wed, 12 May 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

In November 2020, with the approval of the Supreme People’s Court, the Suzhou International Commercial Court (SUICC) was launched in Suzhou Industrial Park, which was also the first international commercial court to be established by a local court.

As a specialized adjudicative body of Suzhou Intermediate People's Court, SUICC has centralized jurisdiction over foreign-related commercial cases within Suzhou Municipality. Specifically, it has the jurisdiction over foreign-related civil and commercial cases of first instance with the amount in controversy less than CNY 5 billion in Suzhou Municipality; over the cases in which the parties appeal against the judgments or rulings of foreign-related civil and commercial cases made by the People's Court of Suzhou Industrial Park; and over other cases with foreign-related factors or related to the open economy that should be accepted by the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court, including civil and commercial cases where one party is a wholly foreign-owned enterprise, disputes over letters of credit and letters of guarantee, cases of judicial assistance in civil and commercial matters, and cases of judicial review of arbitration, etc.

In December 2020, SUICC held a public hearing over Export-Import Bank of Korea v. Changshu Guangcheng Electronics Co., Ltd, a case on a loan contract dispute. This is also the first case heard by SUICC since its establishment. During the trial, the two parties eventually reached a mediation agreement.

On 30 Mar. 2021, the establishment meeting of the Expert Committee of SUICC was held, and 14 experts and scholars were appointed as the members of the Expert Committee, which made the composition of SUICC more professional.

 

 

Cover Photo by Cris Jiao (https://unsplash.com/@lq901209) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)