China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Typical Cases (2020) on IP Protection in Zhejiang Released - China Legal News

Sun, 07 Feb 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

In January 2021, Zhejiang High Court released the typical cases on strengthening judicial protection of intellectual property in 2020.

On Jan. 19, Zhejiang High People’s Court released the typical cases on strengthening judicial protection of intellectual property by courts in Zhejiang province in 2020.

There are eight typical cases, including: the Case regarding Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Dispute of World Trade Center Association v. Taizhou Global Trade Center Co., Ltd.; the Case regarding Trademark Infringement of Adidas Co., Ltd. v. Ruan Guoqiang and Ruan Yongyi; the Case regarding Unfair Competition of Shenzhen Tencent Computer Systems Co., Ltd., and Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Soudao Network Technology Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Juketong Technology Co., Ltd.

Among them, the Case regarding Unfair Competition of Shenzhen Tencent Computer Systems Co., Ltd., and Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Soudao Network Technology Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Juketong Technology Co., Ltd is worthy of much more attention.

The case involves the ownership of data rights and interests and the legitimacy of data scraping.

Pursuant to the judgment, the data controlled by the network operator is divided into two types, raw data and derivative data. For simple raw data, the data controller can only rely on the information rights and interests of the network users, and enjoy the restricted right to use the raw data subject to the agreement between the data controller and the users; for the data resources integrated by simple raw data, the data controller enjoys the competitive rights and interests.

Unauthorized use of simple original data controlled by others, which does not violate the principle of “legality, necessity and consent of users”, should not be deemed as unfair competition; nevertheless, unauthorized destructive use of data resources controlled by others in large scale can be regarded as unfair competition.

Contributors: Yanru Chen 陈彦茹

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Publishes Typical Cases on Public Security Crimes

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases illustrating crimes against public security, emphasizing clarifications on trial criteria and sentencing principles, featuring a case involving serious injuries from objects thrown off a high-rise building.

Beijing Court Upholds Workers' Right to Offline Rest

The Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People's Court ruled that workers are entitled to overtime pay for “invisible overtime work” conducted via social media outside of working hours, protecting their right to “offline rest”.

China Revises State Secrets Protection Law

China’s national legislature, the National People’s Congress, revised the State Secrets Protection Law to enhance information classification, secrecy in technological innovation, and precise protection of state secrets, effective May 1, 2024.