China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing Chaoyang Court Issues White Paper on Foreign-Related Family Cases

Wed, 15 Nov 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 8 Sept. 2023, the Chaoyang Primary People’s Court, Beijing (hereinafter the “Chaoyang Court”) released the “White Paper on Trial of Foreign-Related Family Cases” (hereinafter the “White Paper”, 涉外家事案件审判白皮书) along with typical cases.

Beijing is one of the cities with the largest number of expatriates in China, and the Chaoyang District has the highest concentration of expatriates in the city.

This is because 90 percent of international media organizations, 80 percent of international organizations and chambers of commerce, 70 percent of regional headquarters of multinational companies, and 65 percent of foreign-funded financial institutions in Beijing are located in Chaoyang District.

The White Paper reveals that from 2018 to 2022, the Chaoyang Court concluded a total of 717 foreign-related family cases, with divorce disputes and inheritance disputes accounting for 87.17 percent of these cases.

Although other types of cases were relatively fewer in number, they covered over ten types of marriage and family disputes, including child custody disputes, post-divorce property disputes, and visitation rights disputes.

The Chaoyang Court released eight typical cases of foreign-related family disputes. These cases include procedural issues such as the notarization and authentication of marriage certificates obtained abroad and the re-litigation in Chinese courts before the divorce judgments made by foreign courts are recognized by Chinese courts, as well as substantive issues such as property division in divorce disputes and the determination of the nationality of minor children in custody disputes.

 

 

Photo by Nathan Cima on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)