China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Canada Goose Fined for False Advertising in China

Mon, 27 Dec 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

In June 2021, a related company of Canada Goose in China, Xiji (Shanghai) Trading Co. (hereinafter “Canada Goose”), was fined by the Administration for Market Regulation in Shanghai Huangpu District, for false advertising.

The market regulator ordered Canada Goose to stop publishing illicit advertisements, eliminate negative impacts accordingly, and pay a fine of 450,000 yuan.

Canada Goose is mainly engaged in the sales of the well-known brand CANADA GOOSE down jackets.

The market regulator held that it would be misleading and contradictory with the fact for Canada Goose to claim that the down used in all their products contain “Hutterite, the best and warmest down from Canada”.

As the law enforcement officials found, the heat retention of down is directly related to the corresponding indexes of down fluffiness and content, according to which Canada Goose failed to qualify as the best.

Moreover, Canada Goose’s emphasis on the origin of “Hutterite” to prove the heat retention of down also lacks supporting evidence.

Therefore, their advertisements are classified as deceiving and misleading for it contains false statements.

 

 

Cover Photo by Chi Xiang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.