China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

CBIRC Relaxes Entry Terms of Foreign Insurance Brokers

Tue, 25 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 3 Dec. 2021, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) released the “Notice on Clarifying Measures for the Opening-up of the Insurance Intermediary Market” (hereinafter “the Notice”, 关于明确保险中介市场对外开放有关措施的通知).

The highlights of the Notice are to relax conditions of market entry for foreign insurance intermediaries.

According to the Notice, China will allow insurance intermediary institutions invested and established by foreign insurance group companies or domestic foreign-funded insurance group companies to operate related businesses.

It is reported that the CBIRC will continue to steadily promote the opening-up of the banking and insurance industry.

 

 

Cover Photo by Patrick Xu on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)