China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Supreme Court Releases Typical Cases on Estate Administrators Under Civil Code

Wed, 10 Jun 2026
Categories: China Legal Trends
Editor: C. J. Observer

On May 21, 2026, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released five typical cases regarding the estate administrator system under the Civil Code, focusing on practical difficulties such as determining estate administrators, false waiver of inheritance, and settlement of estate management expenses.

The Inheritance Book of the Civil Code added the estate administrator system on the basis of the original Inheritance Law, systematically stipulating the generation methods, statutory duties, and civil liabilities of estate administrators, filling the gap in estate management rules.

In Case 2 released this time, after Yang passed away, his parents and daughter waived inheritance in writing, but actually received and disposed of his funeral expenses, pensions, and old-age insurance balance of more than 200,000 yuan, and promised to pay debts and paid 50,000 yuan in another case. The court ruled that the heirs denied their intention to waive inheritance through actual behaviors, and it did not belong to the situation where "all heirs waive inheritance", rejecting the creditor's application to designate the civil affairs department as the estate administrator.

“The appointment of civil affairs departments as default estate administrators is strictly a public policy safety net of last resort, applicable only when no eligible heirs exist or when all heirs legitimately renounce their claims”, stated Judge Chen Yifang, Director of the SPC’s First Civil Division, during a press briefing. “If an heir executes a superficial waiver while maintaining actual possession of the assets to evade creditors, such a waiver is null and void”.

 

Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.