China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Adopts Fair Competition Review Regulation

On 11 May 2024, the “Regulation on Fair Competition Review” (公平竞争审查条例, hereinafter the “Regulation”) was adopted at the 32nd executive meeting of the State Council and came into force on 1 Aug. 2024.

For the first time, the Regulation provides a legal framework for fair competition review, specifying the goals, standards, mechanisms, and supervision and guarantees to prevent government departments from issuing policies and measures that exclude or restrict competition.

Previously, the fair competition review system was introduced in 2016 through a State Council document. In 2022, the amended Anti-Monopoly Law called for the establishment and improvement of this system. This Regulation fills the legal gap in the fair competition review system.

The highlights of the Regulation are as follows.

  • All policies and measures related to the economic activities of operators, including laws, administrative regulations, local regulations, rules, normative documents, and specific policy and measures, are subject to fair competition review.
  • Drafted policies and measures shall not contain any content that restricts or indirectly restricts market entry and exit, hinders the free flow of goods and production factors, unreasonably affects production and operation costs, or influences business behavior.

 

 

Photo by Matt Zhang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)