China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Adopts Fair Competition Review Regulation

On 11 May 2024, the “Regulation on Fair Competition Review” (公平竞争审查条例, hereinafter the “Regulation”) was adopted at the 32nd executive meeting of the State Council and came into force on 1 Aug. 2024.

For the first time, the Regulation provides a legal framework for fair competition review, specifying the goals, standards, mechanisms, and supervision and guarantees to prevent government departments from issuing policies and measures that exclude or restrict competition.

Previously, the fair competition review system was introduced in 2016 through a State Council document. In 2022, the amended Anti-Monopoly Law called for the establishment and improvement of this system. This Regulation fills the legal gap in the fair competition review system.

The highlights of the Regulation are as follows.

  • All policies and measures related to the economic activities of operators, including laws, administrative regulations, local regulations, rules, normative documents, and specific policy and measures, are subject to fair competition review.
  • Drafted policies and measures shall not contain any content that restricts or indirectly restricts market entry and exit, hinders the free flow of goods and production factors, unreasonably affects production and operation costs, or influences business behavior.

 

 

Photo by Matt Zhang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.